Editing Comments.Main-MultiplesInLove-20210630T080609
An author name is required.
Must enter valid code
|
Basic editing - Text formatting rules - Documentation index
|
Tables: simple - advanced
|
|
Paragraphs: for a new paragraph, use a blank line;
|
Line break: \\ or
[[<<]]
|
|
-> to indent text,
-< hanging text
|
Join line: \
|
|
Lists:
* for bulleted,
# for numbered,
:term:definition for definition lists
|
|
Emphasis:
''italics''
'''bold'''
'''''bold italics'''''
@@monospaced@@
|
|
References:
[[another page]], [[https://example.com/]], [[link"tool tip"|link text]], [[link|+]], [[#anchor]], [[#anchor|link text]]
|
Signatures: name: ~~~
name and date: ~~~~
|
|
Groups:
[[Group/Page]] displays Page,
[[Group.Page]] displays Group.Page,
[[Group(.Page)]] displays Group,
[[Group/]] links Group homepage
|
|
|
Separators:
!!, !!! for headings,
---- for horizontal line
|
Prevent formatting:
[=...=]
|
|
Other:
[+big+]
[++bigger++]
[-small-]
[--smaller--]
'^superscript^'
'_subscript_'
{+inserted+}
{-deleted-}
|
Preformatted:
[@...@] or
>>pre<<...>><<
|
Preview Comments.Main-MultiplesInLove-20210630T080609
Page is unsaved
An author name is required.
Must enter valid code
End of preview -- remember to save
Top
Science is way behind even observing or studying the "mind" and consciousness.
However the US government published papers about out of body experiences, and making a case for prescience, clairvoyance, and telepathy and the documents were declassified and published years ago. It's a good read.
We have no external world proof of our headmates being real, otherkin headmates or animals in our system being non-human, or so on. So — who would I be to say whether these experiences are fake or real? What matters to me is that they believe it, and they find it healthy & helpful for them. That's really all that matters at the end of the day: is this a good experience for them? Awesome. If not, how can we correct it?