Editing Comments.Main-MultiplesInLove-20210630T080609
An author name is required.
Must enter valid code
|
Basic editing - Text formatting rules - Documentation index
|
Tables: simple - advanced
|
|
Paragraphs: for a new paragraph, use a blank line;
|
Line break: \\ or
[[<<]]
|
|
-> to indent text,
-< hanging text
|
Join line: \
|
|
Lists:
* for bulleted,
# for numbered,
:term:definition for definition lists
|
|
Emphasis:
''italics''
'''bold'''
'''''bold italics'''''
@@monospaced@@
|
|
References:
[[another page]], [[https://example.com/]], [[link"tool tip"|link text]], [[link|+]], [[#anchor]], [[#anchor|link text]]
|
Signatures: name: ~~~
name and date: ~~~~
|
|
Groups:
[[Group/Page]] displays Page,
[[Group.Page]] displays Group.Page,
[[Group(.Page)]] displays Group,
[[Group/]] links Group homepage
|
|
|
Separators:
!!, !!! for headings,
---- for horizontal line
|
Prevent formatting:
[=...=]
|
|
Other:
[+big+]
[++bigger++]
[-small-]
[--smaller--]
'^superscript^'
'_subscript_'
{+inserted+}
{-deleted-}
|
Preformatted:
[@...@] or
>>pre<<...>><<
|
Preview Comments.Main-MultiplesInLove-20210630T080609
Page is unsaved
An author name is required.
Must enter valid code
End of preview -- remember to save
Top
Science is way behind even observing or studying the "mind" and consciousness.
However the US government published papers about out of body experiences, and making a case for prescience, clairvoyance, and telepathy and the documents were declassified and published years ago. It's a good read. Then they funded programs to see whether or not operatives could spy on foreign documents during out of body experiences. Sounds like fiction, but it's not.
We have no external world proof of our headmates being real, otherkin headmates or animals in our system being non-human, or so on. So ? who would I be to say whether these experiences are fake or real? What matters to me is that they believe it, and they find it healthy & helpful for them. That's really all that matters at the end of the day: is this a good experience for them? Awesome. If not, how can we correct it?